Tuesday, March 20, 2007

Memorial for Jane on Charis


If it's Tuesday, I'm blogging today at the Charis Connection (see link at right) as a memorial for Jane. I thought it might be nice to let her speak in her own words, so I culled some snippets from old emails she's written me over the years.

Stop by and take a peek. You'll see why she is much-loved.

P.S. I took the day off Monday to go "play" with Travis and Keri, who work for Tyndale House's author relations department. We went putt putt golfing and fed the alligators. Travis and Keri thought I was kidding when I said that yes, there are gators all over the place in our lakes. They know I'm not kidding now.

~~Angie

Monday, March 19, 2007

HPV Update

There's news on the HPV/cancer vaccine front. And it'll be interesting to see how it's played out in the media.

Fact: A recent study suggests that the prevalence of a sexually transmitted virus (HPV) that can cause cervical cancer is greater than previous estimates had suggested.

Fact: The study indicated that the prevalence of the two main cancer-causing strains--the two strains prevented by the Merck vaccine--"appears to be relatively low."

More: the prevalence of HPV was 26.8 percent among U.S. females in the 14-59 age bracket. Prevalence of the four strains of HPV that Gardasil protects against--was 3.4 percent. THREE PERCENT.

According to the Wall Street Journal (Feb. 28, 2007, p. D8), "the prevalence data doesn't capture cases of women who were infected by HPV in the past but have since been cleared of the virus. (About 90 percent of infections clear within two years.)"

So why are bills being drafted in 20 U.S. states to make Gardasil mandatory for preteen girls? The answer is obvious. $$.

~~Angie

Sunday, March 18, 2007

Pray for Jane's Family



My friend Jane, whom I asked you all to pray for a little while ago, died this morning from leukemia. So I would ask you all to pray for her husband, two sons, and family in the days ahead.

And as sad as I am at the thought of missing Jane in the months ahead, the writer in me is grateful that her books will live on. She has a new one coming out this summer, All the Tea in China, and I know you'd love it. I read the manuscript and found it delightful. It's available to preorder now.

It's easy to praise God when He answers prayer in the way we want him to. It's harder--but just as necessary and proper--to praise him when he answers in a way we didn't expect. So I am praising the Lord for his wisdom, for his faithfulness, and for the fact that he welcomed Jane this morning.

~~Angie

Friday, March 16, 2007

CONTEST!


I'm so excited! The mail man just delivered six ARC (advance readers' copies) of THE ELEVATOR to my house.

And I'm willing to give half of them away. But how?

I've decided to do it this way: I have three people in my immediate family (hubby, son, daughter), and they have ages. (Hint: hubby is way older than me.)

I've decided to send copies to the commenters whose comment numbers match the ages of my family members. Yes, you may comment more than once, but you may NOT comment more than once in a row--in other words, you have to wait to leave a second or third comment until someone else has posted a comment (IOW, you can't sit there and click "post" over and over and over.) Consecutive comments from the same person will be deleted or ignored.

NO, you may not sell the book on eBay. :-)

I'll announce who the winning commenters are in a follow up blog post, then you can email me your addresses.

This is assuming you'd like a free copy, of course. Months ahead of publication time. :-)

Ready, set . . . go!

Angie

Update:

Thanks for your comments on the scene. I suppose my fascination with the process bleeds over, because I DO find it all very interesting! Glad you all do the same.

There is a grand plan to all this, BTW. In book one, Doesn't She Look Natural?, Jen inherits the funeral home and has to face her fears and squeamishness about the whole thing. In that book she helps prepare a couple of bodies in small ways.

By book two, She Always Wore Red, she is in mortuary school, and serving as an apprentice for Gerald while she's going to school. (There's LOT more going on in the book; this is just part of it.)

In book three, She's In a Better Place, Jen will be officially running the funeral home. And the mortuary stuff is really just backdrop for all the stories--each book is really about something else altogether. :-)

Yes, Susan, autopsied bodies are a LOT harder to embalm--in fact, most funeral homes charge extra for autopsied bodies.

And the second step--the one I probably won't detail--is the "cavity embalming." I think I do allude to it, but not many details. This is where they take a long hollow tube, called a trocar, and punch it into the body. They have to perforate all the major organs and then aspirate the pieces. All of this, too, goes down the drain and into the sewer. (Lovely thought, no?) I suppose it's better than what the ancient Egyptians did--they put most of the organs into canopic jars and saved them for the afterlife.

I'm also not being specific about how they plug all the body orifices in case of . . . um, seepage. (I mean, flies land on dead bodies . . . you wouldn't want to see a maggot crawl out of your loved one's nostril, would you?)

This is the sort of lovely detail I probably won't include. :-) My rule is--if it grosses ME out, leave it out. :-)

Thanks for the comments! Please keep 'em coming!

OH! P.S. No, you don't capitalize "missy" because it's like "honey" or "kiddo" and you wouldn't capitalize those. It's a nickname, but not a proper nickname like "Angie." (But to be honest, this is one of those stylistic things that you may as well leave to your editor. Different houses may use different styles.)

And did anyone notice the parallelism in the sentence I loved a couple of days ago? I think what I love about it is the parallelism, the rhythm, and the ba-da-boom at the end. Writing requires as much listening as reading, you know . . .

Well, I've dithered long enough. My migraine is clearing, so I'd better get my act together!

Angie, who really ought to share a NICE scene after this . . .

A scene from the WIP


One of the challenges I'm facing with this second book about the funeral home is being detailed without being OVERLY detailed. In this scene, Jennifer is learning how to do an embalming, under the watchful eye of Gerald, the embalmer. What do you think? Good balance of details without too much gore?

(BTW, this isn't the worst part of an embalming. I don't think I'm going there, at least not in this book.)


After going to my Tuesday morning class, picking up Bugs, and receiving Skeeter’s good health report from the vet, I walk down to the prep room and pull on latex gloves, a rubber apron, and a mask. When he sees that I’m ready, Gerald wheels Waldine Loveman out of the cooler and I help him transfer the body bag to our preparation table.

After Gerald unzips the bag, I see that Waldine is still wearing her housecoat and nightgown. Gerald stands back as I cut the garments away and set them aside. I can’t help but notice that Waldine’s nightgown has been washed so many times the thin cotton is nearly transparent in places. Her housecoat, a simple number with snaps up the front, is whispery soft. No wonder she liked to wear it around the house.

As I survey our latest client, I feel myself mentally shift gears. It’s hard to explain to someone who isn’t involved in the field, but once the clothing is gone, the body on the table becomes simply that—a body. This sort of detachment is probably what allows morticians to perform their work without suffering from emotional overload, but I know one thing for sure--the embalmer’s job is to halt decomposition to the point that the family will be able to hold a viewing and a funeral without being repulsed by the sights, smells, and sounds of a decaying corpse.

Six months ago, I would have shrunk from the sight of a dead client; now I study the body with clinical interest. My pulse quickens, and from out of nowhere I remember that I used to enjoy dissection days in high school biology. Frogs, worms, rabbits—all of them fascinated me.

With a detached eye, I glance at the clipboard that traveled with Waldine, then I check the body. Waldine Loveman is a well-nourished Caucasian female who apparently died of natural causes at age eighty-six. Her skin is remarkably free of scars—I’ve seen everything from appendectomy to Caesarian scars on our last few clients.

“Go ahead.” Gerald nods and ties on his mask. “You know what to do.”

I do, but only from watching Gerald, so my fingers tremble as I pick up a sharp pair of scissors and place the point of a blade at a spot in the hollow of the neck. I press downward until the blade cuts the skin, then I make a small incision and slowly slice my way through the adipose layer beneath the epidermis. I set the scissors aside as Gerald offers an arterial hook.

"Good job,” he says. “Now reach in and catch the jugular.”

“Are you sure you don’t want to do this?”

“We learn best by doing, missy. I’m here—and I won’t let you make a mistake.”

I draw a deep breath and thank the Lord that I’m not practicing on a living patient. I shouldn’t be nervous; at this point, it’s almost impossible for me to make a blunder Gerald couldn’t rectify. Still, I don’t want to mess up. Though I didn’t know her, I want to treat Waldine Loveman with respect.

With gloved fingers I slip the hooked end of the arterial hook into the incision. As I probe the area, I superimpose an image from my anatomy book onto the body’s pale flesh. The internal jugular vein and the common carotid run alongside each other, parallel to the trachea. The jugular lies closest to the skin, right . . . there.

I lift the bluish vein out of the incision, startled, as always, by its surprising size.

“Excellent.” Smiling his approval, Gerald presses on the skin, then threads two pieces of string under the vein and ties them in a loose knot. “Now, go for the carotid.”

Again, I take the arterial hook and go fishing. The hard object to the right is undoubtedly the trachea, so the carotid artery lies just to the left—

My hook retrieves a smooth, pale tube.

“That’s right.” Gerald threads another pair of strings under this artery, ties them, and hands me the scissors. “Now make the T-incision.”

I gulp and bend over the body. I wince as I slice a T into the artery and the vein, then I step back so Gerald can take a look. My left hand is open and extended, and I’m startled when he snaps a piece of chrome tubing into my gloved hand.

Like I’m some kind of surgeon?

“Always wanted to do that,” he says, the corners of his eyes crinkling above his mask. “Fit it into the artery opening, please. Remember—point the head toward the heart.”

I try to squeeze the head of the metal tube into the first T incision, but I must have made the cuts too small. I hesitate, wondering if I should make the opening bigger, but Gerald clears his throat.

I lift my hands and step to the side, then watch in wonder as he seats the tube with the smallest twist of his hand. “Takes practice,” he says, handing me the other tube. “You do the drain tube.”

“We drain through the veins.”

“You’ve got it.”

The drain tube is easier, or maybe this time I’m more relaxed. When both devices are in place, I tie the loose strings around the metal tubes to prevent them from slipping during the pumping process.

“You’re becoming a pro,” Gerald says, smiling. “How are your nerves?”

I feel as jittery as ever, but my kneecaps no longer engage in instantaneous jiggling the moment I approach the prep table. I must be getting used to this.

I reach for a bottle of arterial fluid. “I think I’m okay.”

As Gerald fills the tank of our embalming machine at the sink, I uncap four bottles of formalin, a mixture of formaldehyde, lanolin, tint, and deodorant. Once the Portiboy tank has filled to the correct level with water, I add the arterial fluid and wait for the liquids to mix. When the solution is a uniform pale pink, I connect the end of the Portiboy’s hose to the metal tube we’ve inserted into our client’s carotid artery.

Gerald checks the pressure dial and flips the power switch. With a series of steady clicks, the pump injects arterial fluid into the carotid. Within a matter of minutes the incoming liquid pushes black blood through the tube connected to the jugular. The liquid flows out of the body and onto the table, then it travels along the table gutter, into the sink, and down the drain.

I lean against the counter and watch, amazed again at the efficiency of the human body. I’ve learned that the human circulatory system is a long circular highway with hundreds of smaller side streets. Unless blocked or broken, all the avenues lead back to the heart.

The embalmer creates a detour, forcing a preservative into the body’s highway system even as he pushes dead blood into the public sewers.

I pick up a spray attachment near the sink, ready to break up any clots that might clog the drain, but my attention is diverted by a knock on the prep room door. “Mom?”

I stiffen. My children have gotten used to the idea of living in a funeral home, but they’ve never witnessed an embalming. I don’t think I want them to.


~~Angie, back to work

Thursday, March 15, 2007

Firsts for Congress

(I love this picture. Click on it to see the cat's eyes close up. Hilarious! Maybe it's been photo-shopped, but it's still funny.)

My newspaper recently reported that this is a year of religious "firsts" for Congress: The American people have elected the first Muslim, the first Buddhists, and the first atheist.

The Secular Coalition for America held a contest to identify the highest elected "non-theist" in the land. This week it announced the winner: Rep. Pete Stark, a Democrat from California.

Stark, 75, issued a brief statement confirming "I am a Unitarian who does not believe in a supreme being."

When I was a junior in high school, I was selected to represent my school during a week in Washington, as a guest of my congressman. With several juniors from other area high schools, we toured the D.C. area and met several representatives.

I remember asking several elected officials if they felt their job was to represent their constituents OR to vote their minds. Without exception, they said their job was to vote as they saw fit.

Which made me realize--and reminds me today--of the importance of electing officials who REPRESENT us. Once in office, too many officials assume (perhaps correctly) that the American public is not as well educated on the issues, so they vote according to their conscience--or will.

Our country is a representative democracy--meaning the people govern only as they are represented in government. So if your representative is not truly representing you, find someone who does. And support him/her.

Stepping off my soapbox now,

~~Angie

P.S. I wrote something today that just delighted me. I don't know if anyone else will think it's funny, but I think it's hysterical. (Maybe you had to be here.)

Here's the bit (from the book about the woman who inherited the funeral home):

When Gerald comes through the back door to the prep room, it’s not formaldehyde I smell, but fried chicken. He may have a body in the call car, but he has dinner in his arms.
I could kiss him.

LOL! I may be strange, but I love it!

Wednesday, March 14, 2007

Kids too religious for parents?


Interesting article in the March 2 Wall Street Journal. According to an article on the front page of the Weekend Journal, some kids are becoming more devout than their parents, thus creating havoc in the home. Sixteen year old Kevin Ellstrand, for instance, is the son of self-described secular humanists who shun organized religion. Two years ago Kevin began to follow Christ, but his mother finds it "appalling" that her son doesn't believe in evolution. Kevin says, "I don't want my parents to go to hell for not believing in God. But that is what's going to happen and it really scares me."

And it's not only Christian parents--some Jewish children are deciding to keep kosher when their parents do not. And some Muslim youths are becoming more fervent than their parents.

What are we to make of this? Some say this is a natural product of teenage rebellion; I tend to think that the power of Christ to change lives is real, no matter what the age of the person who surrenders his life. Without a doubt, some teenage conversions are genuine . . . and the proof is visible in changes that persist years down the road. What changes are wrought in a believer's life? Easy: love, joy, peace, goodness, faith, and patience.

No one can deny that many a teenage passion fades in time. Even Jesus spoke of the seed that falls by the road, springs up in shallow soil, and withers in the heat of the sun. But some seeds grow deep, find the nourishment they need, and bring forth much fruit.

Now I have a quick question for you--I need information for the WIP. What do you think of as "funeral food?" In other words, if you were going to make something to take to a grieving family, what would you make?

~~Angie

I Hope You Dance . . .


http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/04/arts/dance/04bloo.html?ex=1330664400&en=e656267965d6caa2&ei=5124&partner=permalink&exprod=permalink

If there's one thing I wish I'd done in my childhood that I didn't do, it's DANCE. I love dance--mostly watching it, since I feel a little inferior about it (being raised in a non-dancing church, you see). I LOVE dance movies, I love ballroom dance, I love dancing around the house. No, not hoochie-coochie dancing, but the kind of dance that expresses joy in movement and in simply being alive.

The above link is to a New York Times article on praise dance. I love it. When I occasionally traveled with Women of Faith a few years back, one of my favorite parts of the program was when Thelma Wells' daughters would do a praise dance. They are professionally trained dancers, and their presentation was simply beautiful. Reverent. Lovely.

So enjoy the article . . . and I hope you dance! In heaven, I'm signing up for a thousand years of ballet.

~~Angie

Monday, March 12, 2007

The Simple Life of Noah Dearborn


Hubby and I just watched this movie: THE SIMPLE LIFE OF NOAH DEARBORN. I highly recommend it--a sweet, poignant film starring the wonderful Sidney Poitier. I know it's available on Netflix.

A hat tip to Robin Lee Hatcher for recommending this one--it's great. All about loving what you do . . . and I can relate to that, as can my hubby.

Speaking of work, here's a WIP update. Friday I finished what was mostly a second draft (though a lot of it was first-draft), and was feeling pretty good until I sat down today and started going over my plot skeleton.

Uh oh. Bleakest moment--no good. Deep structure? Missing key points. This is what happens when you let the characters take you away--they don't know a thing about story structure. :-)

So tomorrow will be a triage day--I sit down and make a list of things to fix, then I jump pack in again. Every pass makes the book better.

~~Angie

Saturday, March 10, 2007

Why do you buy books?


The Feb. 26th issue of Publisher's Weekly listed the results of a survey on the book buying habits of Americans. Readers could choose more than one answer, and these are the top eight answers:

Why do you buy a book?

1. A friend's recommendation 49 percent
2. Familiarity with the author 45 percent
3. Description on jacket 32 percent
4. Reviews 22 percent
5. Advertisement 21 percent
6. Place on bestsellers list 17 percent
7. Reading group pick 16 percent
8. Cover design 12 percent


So . . . why do you buy a book? I buy tons of books, and my deciding factors are usually a friend's recommendation, reviews, and advertisements. (I read reviews in the NYT book review, TIME, NEWSWEEK, PEOPLE, and PUBLISHER'S WEEKLY. A stellar review in any of those will spur my urge to buy. Ditto for a provacative ad.)

So--what are your reasons for buying a book?

~~Angie

Friday, March 09, 2007

No Wonder Most TV is Lousy



I don't know about you, but I gave up on most TV long ago. There are the occasional gems--I fell in love with Alias and 24, but only after I'd watched a couple of seasons on DVD. I still watch the occasional episode of ER, but if I watch anything else on TV these days, it's usually the news or a movie.

Well . . . I just read that there's a new TV series being developed for (drum roll, please): the Geico caveman/cave people. (What is the proper gender-neutral language?)

That's right, you read it here first. Though the project is still at the rudimentary stages, the plan calls for the comedy to be titled "Cavemen" and focus on a trio of prehistoric characters who battle prejudice in modern-day Atlanta. According to the Wall Street Journal, ABC will pay for the pilot and the show.

Here's the really interesting part: because few people even watch commercials these days (they either fast forward through them or channel surf during the break), the powers that be are coming up with other ways to advertise. The cavemen have been showing up outside ads (though I have seen them plastered on billboards in airports--I suppose that's an ad, isn't it?).

For instance, last month an actor dressed as a caveman showed up at the Academy Awards and attended an after-Oscars bash. Also last month, says the WSJ, a caveman played a round of golf with football analyst Phil Simms during his Super Bowl pregame show.

So--look for a caveman appearing near you. I'm not sure if he'll be there to sell Geico Insurance or his new sitcom.

I miss the gecko.

~~Angie

Thursday, March 08, 2007

What is Your Chair Like?


Okay . . . I've heard about the seating debate raging on a few email loops, but I knew the story had hit the big time when I read about it in the Wall Street Journal. According to the WSJ, the chair of choice these days isn't a chair at all . . . but a big, rubber ball. Exercise balls, usually priced at about $25, are a lot cheaper than an Aeron chair (usually over $1,000) and probably a lot more fun. Like the chair pictured here? You can get one at www.fitball.com for $109.95.

According to the WSJ, employees at BlueSky Strategies in Toronto have races on ball chairs when they need a break.

I do tend to get up feeling stiff and creaky after a long day at the desk, but I'm not sure a ball chair is the answer. For one thing, Babe would probably try to carry it around, so it'd pop in a matter of minutes. For another, I'm afraid I'd drift off in thought and roll backward. And how am I supposed to lean back, prop my feet on the desk, and watch a video on a ball chair? Shudder. They might be fun for a while, but not for all day. Still, if it's your thing . . . go for it. And let me know how it feels. :-)

~~Angie

Wednesday, March 07, 2007

BOM: Questions and Answers


Kari asked: "The book absolutely made me think about cloning etc and even bringing someone back from the dead. Even though I thought Diana was a hard woman I saw her desperation! We lost a son born too early and it certainly brought back many memories!Do you ever 2nd guess yourself after the book has been printed or ask yourself what you would have done differently?"

Sometimes, Kari . . . but to be honest, by the time a book has come out, I've gone over it so many times, and so have my editors, that we're all pretty weary with it.

And I can honestly say that I give each book the best I have to give at the time. Of course, life is a learning process, so there are things I would do now that I didn't know to do "back then," but there's no use in dwelling on past mistakes.

So . . . unless I get a chance to go back and edit a book for re-publication, I don't spend a lot of time in regret. There's always something new to work on.

Thanks for coming along on this BOM!

BTW--we've retitled the books in the Fairlawn series (the books about the woman who inherits a funeral home.) The first (finished!) is called DOESN'T SHE LOOK NATURAL? The second (I'm writing now) is SHE ALWAYS WORE RED, and the third will be called SHE'S IN A BETTER PLACE. What do you think?

~~Angie

Tuesday, March 06, 2007

The "Jesus tomb" --an Angie Update


My pal Randy Ingersmanson, novelist, physicist, and a man of many talents, has undertaken an explanation of the so-called "Jesus tomb"--the finding that has many people speculating about Jesus's wife and children.

You can read Randy's explanation here: http://www.ingermanson.com/jesus/art/stats.php .

I watched part of the Discovery channel's explanation, and came away more than satisfied with the way the experts called many of the assumptions into question.

To my way of thinking, it's just another attempt to cast doubt on the truth of the Gospel.

~~Angie

BOM: The Results/Reader Reaction


3 of 15 people found the following review helpful:

The Worst Book I've Ever Read, February 27, 2004
Reviewer: A reader
This book started out good, but later on it becomes boring and unrealistic in everything except the emotions. I bought this book thinking it would be an interesting read but I was severly disapointed. The plot skips around a lot and the main character goes through some "interesting" fazes. (Kicking her husband out for not agreeing about cloneing, etc.) I would never recomend this book to ANYONE (strangers and enemies included).


I'm so thankful for the above review . . . because with it I won first place in a "bad review" contest. (My prize was a bar of bittersweet chocolate.)

And there's the other side of the coin:

Powerful mix of Christianity and current events, September 25, 2005
Reviewer:Christina Lockstein "book addict" (Oconto Falls, WI USA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)
Hunt is one of the strongest writers of our time, Christian or otherwise. Her characterizations are never lazy or weak and her descriptions are deeply moving. The story of Diana seeking her son is extremely relevant in today's political climate. Hunt does a terrific job of researching her subject matter and giving strong debate on both sides. Diana's descent was a little creepy at times, but that's deliberate on Hunt's part. Sometimes we can be equally as guilty of insisting on our way instead of the Lord's way in things. I bawled through the first seventy pages of this book, and spent the rest of it thinking and thanking God for what I have.

(God bless you, Christina.)

Tomorrow: Questions and Answers. Have any? Ask away!

~~Angie

Monday, March 05, 2007

Update: What those letters mean


LOL!

Okay, for those who are unfamiliar with the Myers-Brigg personality profile: The M-BP is an AMAZINGLY accurate personality assessment tool that I use to create characters (and analyze my friends and family). The test, which is relatively simple, involves four basic areas:

People are either an Extroverted or Introverted (E or I)
Intuiters or Sensors (N or S)
Thinkers or Feelers (T or F) and
Judgers or Perceivers (J or P).

There are sixteen possibilities, and you pretty much stay "bent" the same way your entire life. Your Myers-Briggs type has nothing to do with whether you are good or evil, it's just the way you see and react to the world. There are DOZENS of books written about the MB tool; they're all useful and interesting.

Note: the above words aren't defined in the usual way. For instance, most people think I'm extroverted, but the defining question isn't whether or not you're comfortable around people, it's where you go to relax. Would you rather go to a party (E) or to the quiet of your room (I)? Do you make decisions based on information you gather through your senses (S) or from your gut (N)? Do you respond to events primarily with rational thought (T) or with your emotions (F)? And finally, are you a piler (P) or a filer (J)?

You can google "Myers-Briggs" or any of the types (INTJ, ESFP, etc) for more information.

Angie

BOM: The Editing


LOL! I didn't actually remember the editing, but I found my editors' comments in the file, so now it's clear what both Ami and Karen thought--they didn't like my protagonist.

What can I say? I created a woman--an INTJ--who is intellectual, aloof, independent, and determined. A warm fuzzy, she's not. ( I happen to be an INTJ, which probably explains why Diana made perfect sense to me.)

I had to try and find ways to make Diana a little softer and more sympathetic. I wrote her scenes in first person because she makes some pretty wild decisions and I thought it was important that readers understand her thought processes.

I still see the occasional review of this book where people think Diana did the wrong things and is a terrible person. Well, we all do wrong things . . . and Diana, at least, learns from her mistakes. Personally, I think Diana appeals more to readers who are "thinkers" (in Myers-Briggs parlance), and she probably repulses women who are strong "feelers."

But that's just the way she is.

Tomorrow: The results/reader reaction.

~~Angie

Sunday, March 04, 2007

BOM: The Writing



I've just returned from the Florida Christian Writer's Conference and the 20th anniversary celebration . . . what a great time. Got to spend time with friends, too, including Tom Morrisey and Mark Mynheir.

To be honest, I don't remember a lot about writing The Pearl . . . except that it wore me out. Diana goes through a LOT in that story--several major losses, and she doesn't handle them well. So while I didn't actually experience everything Diana did, I sure felt all her grief.

I remember taking my takes to my accountant while I was writing this book. She said something like, "How's the writing going?" I shoved my hair out of my eyes and looked at her like a crazed woman. "Rough."

It wasn't the writing that was hard, it was the living Diana's story.

And to say much more would sort of spoil the book, so I shall zip my lip.

Tomorrow: the editing

~~Angie

Saturday, March 03, 2007

BOM: The Research


Home from Colorado Springs, from the cold to the warm and muggy. :-)

Diana Sheldon, the protagonist of The Pearl, is a professional radio counselor (I was thinking of a Dr. Laura type.) So I had to research radio work, and the easiest way to do that was to visit a radio show. At the time, Tampa Bay had one radio talk show host I liked a lot--Glenn Beck. So I asked Glenn Beck's producer if I could come observe, and he said yes. I drove over to Tampa, sat in on a show, and enjoyed myself a lot. (Now, as I watch Glenn's success even on CNN, I feel proud to say I met him when.)

To write this book, I also had to learn a lot about cloning. It's not a book about cloning, but still, cloning plays a huge part. And when I started to write, I knew most Christians opposed cloning . . . but why? I mean, if they could clone cells to grow someone a new heart, why not let them do it?

Furthermore, if a book is not to be sheer propaganda, it must present both sides of an argument. It was actually easy to come up with good reasons to investigate cloning . . . and then to come up with solid arguments against the practice.

The timing of this book turned out to be incredible. The very week it released, the Raelians announced to the world that they had successfully cloned a human baby. They never proved it, but for a few days there, news of cloning filled all the major media.

P.S. Tonight, Lord willing, I am in Sarasota, for the 20th annual Florida Christian Writer's conference. I'm keynoting at their anniversary banquet, and I just want to publicly congratulate Billie Wilson for twenty years of service to Christian writers!

Tomorrow: the writing

~~Angie

Friday, March 02, 2007

BOM: How the Idea Germinated


I had forgotten about this, but I just found an email in my file dated Aug. 6, 2001. I wrote to some friends:

"As I was reading my Bible this morning, I cam across a verse that brought me up cold: 'Look now, I myself am he! There is no god other than me! I am the one who kills and gives life; I am the one who wounds and heals; no one delivers from my power!"

"I've read this before, but was always assuming God meant that he wounded and/or killed his enemies . . . but now I'm beginning to think he wounds us at times, to work his will in our lives. . . . often we short-change God's sovereignty by assigning 'bad things' to God's permissive will instead of his perfect will, and lately I've been thinking a lot about that. We know he loves us and cares for us, but as I've been considering God as parent, I've come to see that love and care often mean doing things that cause me, the child, to hurt and feel anger and pain.

"Have you seen the commercial with the kids who look into the camera and say, 'I thought you were the worst parents in the world. I hated you. You snooped on me . . . Thanks, mom and dad."

"Ah . . . would it not be human for us to feel the same way toward God when he wounds and heals us?

"I feel a novel theme coming on . . ."

And so I did. That verse, that email, became the idea that bloomed into The Pearl. Sometimes God leads us through the valley of the shadow of death. He does that to my protagonist, Diana, but she doesn't want to go there . . . and so the drama begins.

Tomorrow: The research

~Angie

Thursday, March 01, 2007

Book of the Month: THE PEARL


Welcome back to another book of the month! This month's featured novel is THE PEARL, published by WestBow in 2003.

Catalog copy:

She had the perfect life until the accident. Now science offers an opportunity to replace what she has lost--but at what cost?

Diana and Steve Sheldon had it all--successful careers, nice home, a lovely teenage daughter, an adorable five-year-old son. But when a freak accident ravages their happy family, Diana, a professional radio counselor, finds herself viewing the world through new eyes of grief--and accepting ideas and situations she would have considered unacceptable only a few weeks before.

When a research foundation offers to restore her loss through a medical marvel, Diana is convinced she has found the answer to her family's anguish. Determined to sacrifice anything that stands between her and healing for her broken heart, she proceeds along a dangerous course, never dreaming that healing might prove more destructive than hurt...

As timely as today's newspaper, The Pearl is an honest, heart-rending look at life and faith through a contemporary mother's eyes.

Tomorrow: the germination of the idea.

~~Angie

Wednesday, February 28, 2007

Now I Lay Me Down to Sleep . . .


God is so good. We are having a great time up here at Glen Eyrie, and we're discovering some wonderful writers. Megan DiMaria (you'll be hearing from her real soon, I'm sure), told me about an organization called "Now I Lay Me Down to Sleep." Wow--not only is this an incredible concept, but it was exactly what I needed for my novel-in-progress.

The idea is this--professional photographers volunteer to take pictures of babies who have either died or who will not live long. These are beautiful pictures that can stay with a family so a grieving mother and father will have a lovely remembrance of their child.

A picture is worth a thousand words, so why don't you check out their slide show at www.nowIlaymedowntosleep.org .

It's amazing. When an older person or child dies, the family has lots of memories and photographs . . . but when an infant dies, often the grief-stricken parents are too stunned to think about such things. Later, when they are asked how many children they have . . . well, you can see where I'm going. Parents need photos of these precious babies in their homes because those children, though they may have lived only an hour or a day or two, are part of that family.

My hat is off and my heart is humbled by these caring photographers. What an incredible service and thoughtful idea.

An aside--it's supposed to SNOW here today! The high is only thirty-something degrees, but the forecast calls for sun tomorrow. That's good--because my family is ready to see me again. :-)

Have a lovely day!

P.S. The photo is of Kathy Mackel, who writes "Christian chillers." Fitting, no? :-)

Angie

Tuesday, February 27, 2007

Glen Eyrie


Good morning! Comin' at you live from beautiful Glen Eyrie, in the gorgeous mountains of Colorado! We've seen long horned sheep, wild turkeys, and all kinds of interesting wildlife--and . . . it's COLD here! Not bitterly, and we're not out in it much, but cold enough for this Florida girl to be glad she brought her gloves!

Photo: Al Gansky, the birthday boy. Nancy Rue, Kathy Mackel, and Al and Becky Gansky are staying in the "Pink House"--an older mansion that the Navigators uses as housing. It's lovely. Al and Becky are staying in the bedroom that Bill Graham favors. :-) We keep teasing Al about having to roll out of the Billy Graham bed every morning.

BTW--today is the Rev. Al's 57th birthday! You can drop him a happy birthday message at Alton@altongansky.com. (LOL--correction! 8:40 a.m. and Al has just informed me that it's his fifty-FOURTH birthday. I've aged him three additional years in a day.)

And thanks SO much for "shouting out!" on the blog! (You, too, Mom! Was that your first comment ever?) It's nice to know I'm not pontificating to an empty cyber abyss. :-)

We're having a grand old time up here in the mountains. Have a group of about 50 folks who are watching us do improvisation, and teach, and just generally talk about what we love--writing and reaching people.

And (confidential to BJ)--I actually got to watch the last half of 24 last night. What in the world is LOGAN doing back? Ack! It took me five minutes to recognize that grizzled old guy! (And where's Martha? Do you think he done her in, as they said in My Fair Lady?)

Well, enough rambling. I'm going to see if there's any hot water in the tank.

Thanks again for shouting out!

~~Angie

Sunday, February 25, 2007

Shout Out!

I'm going to be traveling and teaching for the next couple of days, so thought it might be fun to let YOU write for a while.

I could go into the computer innards and see how many "hits" this blog gets every day, but I'd rather hear from you. Won't you take a minute just to say "hi" or something?

For Mom and Aunt Irene: click on "add a comment," then type your comment in the box that opens up. You can type your name in the box, and then click "anonymous" in the options below the box. Hassle-free. :-)

Please take a minute to say "hello"!

~~Angie

Saturday, February 24, 2007

Allison and Jane and the Oscars


I love Allison Krauss. Her song "There's a Ghost in this House" has a lovely, lilting, melancholy quality that haunts.

Lately I've been thinking of that song a lot. You see, since Wednesday I've noticed a vague odor in my kitchen. I can't pinpoint it, and I've sniffed in every cupboard, in the trash compactor, and under the sink. I've looked under furniture and vaccumed up every little piece of everything.

And yet I keep singing, "There's a stink in this house." It's not a good smell--smells like something dead, and believe me, after the Month of the Rats, I know what dead smells like.

Reminds me of the first time I met cop writer Mark Mynheir--over dinner at a writer's conference, we spent the entire night talking about how to describe the smell of a dead body. (You had to be there.)

But I digress.

I'm heading to Colorado Springs tomorrow to be with gal pals Nancy Rue and Kathy Mackel, and guy pal Al Gansky and his lovely wife, Becky. Looking forward to meeting Susan, aka Accidental Poet, whose blog I've enjoyed for a long time now. Not sure how consistent I'll be in this space, but we have a Book of the Month coming up, so I'll try to at least get those posts up.

I heard--but haven't been able to confirm--that the state of Texas somehow overruled their governor's mandate that all schoolgirls be vaccinated against HPV. Anyone got the details on that?

Good news this week from Foreword Magazine (a general market magazine that goes to bookstores and libraries. It features books from independent publishers). They have a "Book of the Year" contest every year, and three of my books are finalists: THE NOVELIST, MAGDALENE, and UNCHARTED. I like this contest because it puts Christian novels up against general market novels--Magdalene, for instance, was entered in the historical category, so it's competing against all entered historical novels. Years ago, when I first started entering this contest, there wasn't a specific category for religious fiction, so the first time my book won a medallion, it was right up there with a book in the gay and lesbian category. I like that--it speaks to me of salt getting out of the salt shaker. :-)

And about the Oscars--I'm not going to be watching (because I'll be at Glen Eyrie), but the Wall Street Journal offered an interesting perspective this week. All the actresses in the "Best Actress" category played roles that could be described as "women behaving badly." And three of the actresses are in the AARP range--Meryl Streep is 57, Helen Mirren is 61, and Dame Judi Dench is 72.

My hat's off to all of 'em. Long live mature women, and thank heaven the writers are giving us something other than twenty-something-women fighting over sixty-something men.

LOL. I haven't seen any of the nominated movies this year. No time to go . . .

One more thing, and I'll end this rambling post. A few days ago I mentioned my friend Jane Orcutt and asked you to pray for her. Jane's condition is not good, and several of my friends have set today aside to pray specifically for her. Will you please ask the Lord to strengthen, encourage, and heal Jane? Thank you for praying.

~~Angie

Friday, February 23, 2007

Bigfoot/Bigfeet?


In Sunday's paper, I read an article that more than piqued my interest. As a fan of shows like The X-Files, I've always been interested in the inexplicable. This article more than qualifies.

Seems that a foot turned up in the landfill in Spotsylvania County, VA. At first deputies thought someone had committed a murder (or at the very least, a maiming), so they began to look for other body parts. Finding none, they went back to the foot. It's eight-inches long with five long toes . . . and now they've decided it's not human.

But what is it? Gorillas don't roam in Virginia (and, incidentally, I don't think Bigfoot does, either.)

The foot was cleanly sawed off, and authorities have sifted through another 127 tons of trash to make sure there weren't other limbs sawn asunder and recycled. Some say the appendage resembles a bear's skinned hind paw. Tim Biscardi, a bigfoot believer, posted an image ofthe foot on www.searchingforbigfoot.com . He's not sure this foot is a bigfoot's foot (try saying that a couple of times), but he believes in them. (You can go there if you want to see the picture. Ick.)

If the foot is a bigfoot/sasquatch/yenti, then it's small and probably from a child.

Bob Hagan, president of the Fredericksburg Regional Chamber of Commerce, says the foot is a possible marketing tool for the area. "It might be a real pull for tourism," he toldl the Washington Post. "Minnesota has Paul Bunyan; we'd have to go with just Bunion."

Snort.

~~Angie

Thursday, February 22, 2007

P.S.


Yes, the story of the 21-week-old preemie (born at 21 weeks gestation) who has survived and is doing well is great news.

And look at this 3D sonogram picture I found on the web--look at that face! Isn't it amazing? (Click to see a larger picture.)

~~Angie

Time Magazine--Pot Calling the Kettle Black?


This week's Time Magazine (Feb. 26, 2007) features a cover story titled "The Abortion Campaign You Never Hear About: Crisis pregnancy centers are working to win over one woman at a time. But are they playing fair?

I've had only a few moments to skim the story, but the gist seems to be that by letting pregnant women hold life-sized plastic models of their unborn babies, crisis pregnancy counselors are extending an emotional appeal that is "unfair." By telling women that abortion increases the chance for breast cancer, CPCs are using scare tactics.

They quote Christopher Hollis, Planned Parenthood's vice president for governmental and political affairs in North Carolina. He says, "What is really tragic to me is that a woman goes into a center looking for information, looking to be able to make a better, healthy choice, and she doesn't get all the facts."

Excuuuuuse me? I'm sorry, but that's what we've felt about Planned Parenthood centers for YEARS. Women there are not told they're carrying a baby, but a lump of cells called a "zygote" or a "fetus." After hearing former NOW-president Patricia Ireland speak, an editor friend of mine remarked that he got the feeling she would rather call the unborn child a potato than a baby.

The Time article goes on to say that while counselors at crisis pregnancy centers lay out the physical and psychological risks associated with abortion, "they don't mention that the risk of death in childbirth is 12 times as high and that many women . . . experience only relief." The magazine clearly forgot one statistic--the risk of death in an abortion clinic is 100 percent. All the babies die.

And lately politicians have stopped trumpeting that abortion is a woman's right (an inherently selfish position) to making a bid for sympathy. Hillary Clinton has called abortion "a sad, even tragic choice to many, many women . . ." People are reluctant to speak against abortion because to do so is to hurt the feelings of women who are already hurting, broken, and sad . . .

Isn't that like saying that it's okay to kill your elderly mother (who's inconvenient, whose appearance in your home was unplanned, and whose medicines you can't afford) as long as you feel bad about it? According to Time, many women who eliminate their babies feel nothing but relief. If some troubled, overworked, overburdened women eliminated their adolescents, they might feel relief, too. But not MOST women. Not women whose hearts are still tender and whose minds are still open to the truth.

What are we doing? Abortion providers are disguising the truth with language and denying women the right to know that 1) they are carrying a human child and 2) they are increasing their risk of breast cancer and 3) help is available. People who fight for abortion rights at any cost are obviating the God-given desire to nurture. Women are becoming hardened through repeated denials . . . or, if they are unable to suppress their natural feelings, they are suffering post-abortion guilt.

We who are pro-life are often accused of not walking our talk, but those who say that aren't listening or looking. We do adopt these babies--there are more waiting adoptive parents than available infants and young children. We do provide financial, emotional, and career support for expectant mothers. The Time article, to its credit, points out that one clinic offers everything from emergency food and formula to strollers and baby clothes to help with the rent.

Last week I spoke at a Valentine's Day event sponsored by A Woman's Place Ministries in Tampa. (http://www.awpm.net . ) As I waited my turn to speak, I heard stories about how over 100 young women had seen their babies on the sonogram machine and had decided to give birth rather than have an abortion. There were about 100 women in the audience that day, and I looked around, amazed that so many precious lives had been saved . . . in part, because of technology. Once young mothers see that there's a real baby within their wombs, it's a struggle against nature to press ahead with the destruction of that precious life.

I stood to speak and was so choked up, I could barely manage it. I managed to say, "I'm an adoptive mother," and when I heard the murmur pass through the room, I knew they understood the reason for my tears. Fortunately, I'd brought my linen napkin from the table. :-)

I don't know . . . lately I've been reading about this HPV vaccine being rushed through states and required for girls as young as nine. Our society seems to have accepted that girls will be, must be, promiscuous, so we will do all we can to eradicate the natural results of promiscuity. Get an STD? We'll give you a vaccine. Get pregnant? Get an abortion.

Through it all, the unspoken message is this: life is all about pleasure, so do what you want, when you want, to whom you want.

That sort of selfishness is the antithesis of a Christian life. It used to be the opposite of a moral life, but morality is based on shifting stands these days . . .

At least there is good news on one front: Somewhere on my desk (madly shuffling through papers) is an article from today's paper that says the drug company Merck is pulling back on its efforts to push through the law that requires girls to have the HPV vaccine. Why? Because the vaccine needs more testing. It has NOT been effectively tested on children.

Shame on them for the psychological attack they've launched on the American public over the last few months. Shame on them for implying that their expensive vaccine will completely eradicate cervical cancer--or that it's the only answer for the HPV virus. Shame on them for shamelessly putting money into politicians pockets and then pushing for this vaccine's requirement. (Google for my past columns on this if you want details.)

And shame on us if we swallow those half-truths.

~~Angie

For more information on the link between abortion and breast cancer, go to http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com .

Wednesday, February 21, 2007

The Mac Attack


One of the most fun things about the new iMac is the tiny camera tucked into the top of the monitor. On its first night in the house, hubby and I were staring at it . . . and after we snapped the picture, we discovered that the Son was clowning in the background!

The transition has gone very smoothly, thanks to a couple of books recommended by Mac friend. SWITCHING TO THE MAC--I think I would have been lost without it.

My only problem to date is getting my accounting software, Mac version, to import my Windows version. I've done everything they told me to do, and it just won't work. Fortunately, a quick Google of the problem revealed that I'm not alone . . . a lot of people are struggling with this one. So tomorrow I suppose I'll be spending some time of the phone with a customer service representative . . . not a good thing when one is on deadline!

Yes, I have to have the second draft of the WIP finished this week because I leave for Colorado Springs on Sunday, for the workshop I'm holding with Nancy Rue, Al Gansky, and Kathryn Mackel. We're going to have a ball and we're planning some innovative things.

Better get to work now . . .

~~Angie

Tuesday, February 20, 2007

I'm a convert

Well, I've joined the ranks I thought I would never join.

Like thousands of other computer lovers, I upgraded to Vista and MS Office 2007 at the end of January. Vista worked fine, though it slowed down the computer, didn't recognize my printer, and didn't know how to run a couple of my programs. But there was a glitch in the Office program, so I called support.

And called again. In fact, I spent an average of three hours a day for a week on the phone with folks in India, Canada, and Washington state--I think. And I got so frustrated that I ordered a Mac.

Right now my mother is probably asking why--it's not because of the commercials, where the Mac is the cool guy and the PC guy is nice and nerdy. It's because Macs don't get viruses (yet), they don't give you the Blue Screen of Death, and they don't hang up like PCs do. And yes, they are cool. But mostly I was simply tired of messing with things.

While I waited for my Macs to arrive, I kept talking to the tech support people, who finally gave up. And--get this--they gave me a full refund on Office 2007, plus they're mailing me a full edition, gratis. Of course, I'm not sure I'll load it. The program is working fine on my laptop, but I never could get it reinstalled on my desktop. (They had me delete it to fix the glitch, and it would never get back on the computer.)

So--most of last week I was working a little and learning a lot. The Mac, as you know, is completely different, so I'm dealing with new language, new icons, and new ways of doing things. I keep looking for the control/alt/delete thing even though I haven't needed it. :-0

So far I've fried one external hard drive (my fault), and filled another hard drive, but by the middle of next week I hope to have a handle on everything.

And I'm a happy Mac mama . . . though still learning. (Oh--and the new computer is why the picture of my daughter is crooked. It's right-side up in iPhoto, but not when I insert it. Hmm.)

~~Angie

Monday, February 19, 2007

Tony Dungy Rules in Tampa Bay!



I know the Super Bowl has come and gone, but hubby just came home with a souvenir t-shirt. I love it, and I especially agree with the sentiment.

Thank you, Tony Dungy, for what you built in Tampa Bay!

And thank you for showing that Christian men are steadfast and strong. You are a true champion.

~~Angie

Sunday, February 18, 2007

My daughter's new look



My daughter sent me a photo.

Hard to believe someone as hip as this has someone as square as me for a Mom.

Sorry about it being sideways . . . I'll explain later.

~~Angie

(She'll probably kill me if she sees this.)

Saturday, February 17, 2007

Venusian Beauties



http://films.thelot.com/films/20453

LOL! My friend Jeff Gerke, who writes Christian novels as Jefferson Scott, has a major role in this short film, produced for a short film competition. If you like the old sci fi movies--think Plan Nine from Outer Space--you'll find this a HOOT.

Congratulations, Jeff! (He's the tall one who tells the radar operator to ignore the blip on the screen.)

Angie

Chapter A Week


Just thought I'd spread the word about a service you may not have heard of--the Christian fiction Chapter A Week program.

If you'd like to receive a sample excerpt from some of the best writers of Christian fiction, simply send an email to this address:

Chapteraweek-subscribe@yahoogroups.com.

That's it! Every Friday morning, Lord willing, you'll receive a new chapter from an author--one you may not have heard of. What a great way to discover new books and new writers!

So subscribe today--your inbox will not be flooded, I promise.

~~Angie

Friday, February 16, 2007

Looking Behind the Words . . .


Another one of my articles for the TAMPA TRIBUNE:

A column in the February 5th Wall Street Journal caught my attention. Cynthia Crossen explained the history of dog catchers—an unpleasant occupation that became necessary when unclaimed dogs roamed city streets. One man’s pet, apparently, was another man’s pest.

In 1877, Crossen reported, New York City passed a dog ordinance, built a dog pound, and hired dog catchers. After stray canines were rounded up, owners were given 48 hours to claim their pets. Unclaimed animals, up to 100 at a time, were placed in a large iron cage and lowered into the East River by a derrick. After several minutes, during which the poor animals struggled and clawed each other in a fruitless effort to survive, the cage was hoisted up and the dead dogs removed.

Can you imagine the outcry if that scenario were repeated today? Animal lovers, including myself, would be incensed. Yet history is filled with similar cruelties.

A few years ago I read Claude Lanzmann’s Shoah, an oral history of the Holocaust. I shuddered as I read the testimony of a Jewish man who had to help open a mass grave—the Nazis intended to burn the bodies and eradicate traces of the death camp at Vilna.

“When we first opened the graves,” the survivor said, “we couldn’t help it, we all burst out sobbing. . . . The Germans even forbade us to use the words ‘corpse’ or ‘victim.’ The dead were blocks of wood . . . with absolutely no importance. . . . The Germans made us refer to the bodies as Figuren, that is, as puppets, as dolls, or as Schmattes, which means ‘rags.’”

Once again, language is used to disguise a terrible truth.

In March 1857, in the case of Dred Scott v. Sanford, the United States Supreme Court ruled that all blacks—slaves as well as free--were not and could never be citizens of the United States. As to the Constitution, which declares that all men are created equal, Justice Taney wrote that “it is too clear for dispute, that the enslaved African race were not intended to be included, and formed no part of the people who framed and adopted this declaration . . . .”

The members of the court who ruled against the African-American Dred Scott—along with the dog catchers and the Nazis at Vilna--apparently bought into Hamlet’s argument that “there is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so.”

Hamlet would have no problem justifying the disintegration of pets to pests, of prisoners to puppets, of people to property.
But Hamlet’s argument is false. Some acts violate moral decency and divine laws.

I have been following the case of Dr. Anna Pou of New Orleans, who is accused of killing elderly patients in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. Her supporters say she did her best to make her patients comfortable under horrendous conditions. The state of Louisiana alleges that she killed patients who were too ill too evacuate.

I have no opinion about Dr. Pou’s guilt or innocence, but I am glad that the state of Louisiana is willing to prosecute anyone who would murder elderly people who have become an inconvenience. An inconvenient patient, you see, is probably someone’s grandmother.

While I was researching my novel-in-progress, I stumbled across a website featuring stories from women who had aborted their babies. One woman, after discovering that her baby had severe hydrocephalus, wrote, “He was a perfect little soul in a damaged body. It was our job as his parents to send him up to heaven.”

I felt a chill as I read that comment. My heart breaks for mothers and fathers who discover that their children have a medical problem, but who are we to decide which problems are acceptable and which are not? How is thinking of a child as “damaged” and disposable different from labeling elderly people “inconvenient” or the 1857 Supreme Court decision that African Americans are “non-citizens” and undeserving of protection under the Constitution? The logic with which we condemn damaged, inconvenient, or problematic preborn babies would also condemn the elderly, the infirm, and the imprisoned.

Preborn babies are fully deserving of life and protection . . . especially those who are weak.

My friend, Judy Miller, recently emailed me about her daughter, Michelle. If Judy had had access to modern ultrasound scanning when she was pregnant, most doctors would have advised an abortion, for Michelle was microcephalic (small-brained) and would be profoundly retarded. But that special child taught Judy and her husband about love.

“The doctors said she wouldn't live beyond the age of five,” writes Judy. “But though she could never talk, walk, or feed herself, her sweet smile and loving spirit shone with unbelievable radiance for thirty years. Early in her life, we had 100 volunteers coming to our home each week to help us pattern her. Some had never been around a child with mental retardation and she opened a door to shed light into their unenlightened world. Her funeral was attended by many of those same people.

“Was it difficult? You bet! Did we receive more than we gave by having her in our lives? You bet.”

Judy sums up her experience this way: “I'd do it all again. Having a child who is profoundly handicapped helps you experience a depth of love unlike any other. You love without the expectation of anything in return.”

Sometimes we reach the limit of what medical science can accomplish. But if we consistently choose life, we can console ourselves by knowing that we did all we could for the child we love.

So let’s take a closer look at the neutral and often pleasant phrases we use to cloak moral wrongs. We have steeped in denial for too long.

~~Angie

Thursday, February 15, 2007

How Many of You Out there?


HowManyOfMe.com
LogoThere are:
442
people with my name
in the U.S.A.

How many have your name?





I wish I had my mother's name. She's an original. :-)

~Angie

Wednesday, February 14, 2007

China Loses a Bit of its Charm


I don't know about you, but one of my favorite things about international travel is noticing signage--for instance, in Great Britain, instead of seeing signs that say "Watch for falling rocks," I saw signs that said, "Mind your windscreen."


On the tube, instead of hearing "Watch your step," I heard, "Mind the gap." (VBG)


I recently read an article in the Wall Street Journal about China . . . and it made me a little sad. Beijing is trying to get ready for the 2008 Summer Olympics, so they are going throughout the country and "fixing" signs that have comical or perplexing (to us) translations.


For instance--on a park lawn, instead of reading "Keep Off the Grass," the current sign says, "Show Mercy to the Tender Grass."


On a handicapped sign--beneath a picture of a wheelchair--the English reads "Deformed Person."


They've already put up a new sign on the "Hospital of Proctology" which was formerly known as "The Dongda Hospital for Anus and Intestine Disease."


The Chinese have already replaced road signs that used to say "To take notice of safe: The slippery are very crafty." (Meaning: Be careful, slippery walkway.)


I remember watching the excellent Chinese movie, "Raise the Red Lantern." The translator who did the subtitles obviously didn't speak English as his first language, but most of the translations were understandable. One of them, though, made me chuckle. One wife was speaking to another wife, and the second wife was pouting. I think the first wife meant to say, "Don't be so moody," but in the subtitles she said, "Don't be so groovy."
I hope the Chinese don't completely eradicate the traces of their unique interpretations. I, for one, find most of them groovy.
~Angie

Tuesday, February 13, 2007

Scotland, Anyone?


My goodness, LOL, I can't believe I once wondered if I'd ever find anything to blog about. Right now my blog inbox is piled up with posts, and I keep thinking of more things to say! Important things!


But right now I have to tell you about Lizzie Higgs' new book, MY HEART'S IN THE LOWLANDS. Liz feels about Scotland the same way I feel about Ireland . . . she adores it, and her adoration comes through in this delightfully uplifting book that makes you feel as though you and Liz are actually touring the highlands together. I smiled and ahhhhhed all theway through, and I know you will, too. So if you've some Scottish plaid in your background, or even if you haven't, you'll love this book.


(And aren't Liz's Scottish novels wonderful? She's a master and truly one of the smartest, most delightful women I know.)


Best of all, Liz's publisher is holding a contest. The winner gets a nine-day trip for two to Bonny Scotland! (I wonder if Liz is available to act as tour guide?) No purchase necessary.


To enter, send a postcard with your name, address, and phone number to:


WaterBrook Press

Attn: Bonny Scotland Giveaway

12265 Oracle Boulevard, Suite 200

Colorado Springs, CO 80921


Entries must be postmarked by April 30, 2007. Only one entry per person, please. (I've already entered myself, my mom, my SIL, and my daughter--in the hope, of course, that if they win, they'll allow me to tag along and tote luggage.)


~~Angie

Monday, February 12, 2007

Cremation or Burial? Does it Matter?


You may remember that I'm working on a series set in a funeral home. (Trust me, the series isn't funereal. It's really rather humorous.)


To support the series, of course, I've had to do a lot of research in the areas of death and dying. And while doing that research, I've become convinced that if given a choice between cremation and burial, I'll take burial. Why?

A couple of reasons, actually. First, burial is the biblical example. All of the patriarchs were buried, and their bodies lovingly cared for. Think of Joseph asking that his bones be carried back to the Promised Land. Think of Abraham buying land to bury his beloved wife, Sarah. Only the pagan nations burned their dead.

Second, God created man body and soul. We are bipartite creatures. And I think lovingly tucking the body away in a "casket" (definition: a container for treasured things) shows more respect that burning something up.
Third, burial is a metaphor. Just as we are baptized under the water and brought up as a picture of Christ's death and resurrection, so our burial is a picture of us "sleeping" and waiting for the resurrection . . . and there's nothing metaphorical about that.

I found this quote in an online article:

Burial is a fitting earthly end to the life of a faithful Christian, a Christian who has been “buried with Christ in baptism” and is waiting to be raised with him in glory (Rom. 6:4). A Christian burial does not mean that we are “in denial” about the decomposition of bodies—that is part of the Edenic curse (Gen. 3:19). It does mean that this decomposition is not what, in this act of worship, we proclaim as the ultimate truth about the one to whom we’ve said goodbye.


Burial conveys the image of sleep, the metaphor Jesus and his apostles used repeatedly for the believing dead (John 11:11; 1 Cor. 15:51; 1 Thess. 4:13–14). It conveys a message, a message quite different from that of a body already speed-decayed, a body consumed by fire.

(Source: http://touchstonemag.com/archives/article.php?id=20-01-024-v).

Of course, God can reconstruct any body, one that's been turned to ashes or one that's turned back into the "dust" from which it came; that's not the point. The point is that in our choice, we have an opportunity to paint a word picture and give a testimony even in this choice. So, given the option between cremation and burial, I'll take the one that looks like putting me down for a nice nap.
I think there's something comforting about laying a loved one to rest and waiting for the expectation of resurrection. Maybe it's just me, but I don't think an urn on the mantle says quite the same thing.

Just my two cents.
~~Angie

Sunday, February 11, 2007

Super Bowl Postscript



Did you see this photo of Tony Dungy and the Colts thanking God after their Super Bowl victory? (HT to Randy Alcorn at http://www.epm.org for the photo!)

I don't think God cares as much about who won that game as He does about the effect testimonies like this have on the world. As a friend told me once, God cares more about our reactions than our actions . . . there's a lot of truth in that.

How do we react to victory? To defeat? Are we willing to praise and thank Him no matter what comes?

~~Angie